SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Kar) 216

H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
Manager, K. S. R. T. C. – Appellant
Versus
Saraswathamma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri.F.S.Dabali., Advocate
For the Respondent: Sri.K.R.Ramesh

JUDGMENT :

Both the appeals are filed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (for short, ‘Corporation) under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act challenging the judgment and award dated 18.12.2013 passed by the MACT, Tumkur in MVC Nos.590/2008 and 8267/2009, respectively. Since the challenge is to the same judgment, both the appeals are clubbed together, heard and common judgment is being passed.

2. Facts giving rise to the filing of the appeals briefly stated are that on 01.02.2008 at about 8.00 p.m. the deceased Rudrappa was proceeding on his moped near Nagenahalli gate, Bengaluru – Doddaballapura road. At that time, the BMTC bus bearing registration No.KA40/F92 came at a high speed and in a rash and negligent manner, dashed against the moped. As a result of the aforesaid accident, the deceased sustained grievous injuries and died at the spot.

3. The claimants filed a petition under Section 166 of the Act on the ground that the deceased was aged about 53 years at the time of accident, was working as a conductor and was earning Rs.11,955/- per month. The claimants

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top