SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 2224

SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Nagendrappa – Appellant
Versus
Tungamma C. – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM, J.

1. The appellant/defendant has filed the present appeal questioning the judgment and decree dated 07.09.2016 passed in R.A. No. 100/2013 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Holalkere confirming the judgment and decree dated 28.10.2013 passed in O.S. No. 16/2008 on the file of Civil Judge and JMFC, Holalkere.

2. The facts leading to this case are that, the respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for bare injunction in O.S. No. 16/2008. The case of the respondent/plaintiff is that she is the owner in exclusive possession of suit house and the said property was purchased by the plaintiff under registered sale deed dated 04.12.1978.The plaintiff further averred in the plaint that she has put up construction after securing permission from the Panchayat. The plaintiff further contended in the plaint that at the time of construction of the house she has left open space on the eastern side of suit property and at that stage the present appellant/defendant who is residing towards the eastern side of the suit property has picked up quarrel and is trying to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the said property by the respondent/plaintiff. Hence,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top