SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Kar) 2042

ALOK ARADHE, H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
Legal Manager, Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Anantha Padmanabha Rao – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
P. Mahesh, B. Pradeep.

JUDGMENT :

H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD, J.

1. M.F.A.No.6421/2016 has been filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', for short) by the insurance company whereas, M.F.A.Crob.No.8/2017 under Order 41 Rule 22 of CPC has been filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of the amount of compensation and also contributory negligence. Since, both, the appeal and the cross-objection arise out of the same accident as well as a common judgment, they were heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.

2. Facts leading to filing of these appeal and cross-objection briefly stated are that on 01.12.2014 at about 8.20 p.m. deceased, namely, Pramod Rao was traveling along with his friends in a car bearing registration No.KA-53/P-351 from Koppala to Bangalore. When they reached near Nelahal, Sira Tumkur NH-48 road, a tractor bearing registration No.KA-06/TA-3254- 3255 was taking turn towards service road. At that time, the driver of the car drove the car in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the tractor. As a result of aforesaid accident, the deceased died at the spot.

3. The claimants filed a petition under Section 166 of the Ac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top