B.VEERAPPA, V.SRISHANANDA
HARISHA, S/O MURTHAPPA, @ NARASIMHAMURTHY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
B.VEERAPPA. J,
1. Yet another appeal which requires remand for the legal errors committed by the learned Sessions Judge as well as learned Public Prosecutor while conducting the proceedings/trial.
2. Accused No.1, who is the husband of the deceased has filed the present criminal appeal against the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 17th May, 2016 made in S.C.No.5010/2015 on the file of the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madhugiri convicting him for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 302 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and acquitting accused Nos.2 to 4 for the said offences.
I -Facts of the case
3. It is the case of the prosecution that the deceased -Gayathri and accused No.1 were married about three years prior to the incident and the deceased was residing along with accused Nos.1 to 4 in the house of accused No.3 at Yelahanka, Bangalore North Taluk. After the marriage, accused No.1 was suspecting the fidelity of his wife -Gayathri and used to harass her physically and mentally. On 2.9.2014 when deceased-Gayathri, her husband accused No.1 and others had come to the house of C.W.5
Rajaram Prasad Yadav –vs- State of Bihar and another reported in (2013)14 SCC 461
Commissioner of Police, Delhi and another –vs- Registrar
Maneka Sanjay Gandhi v. Rani Jethmalani AIR 1979 SC 468 at 470
State of M.P –vs- Shobharam and others reported in AIR 1966 SC 1910
Mohd. Hussain v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.