SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Kar) 242

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J.
G. Krishnegowda, S/o Gopalagowda – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka, Anti Corruption Bureau - RESPONDENT
CRL.P.No.2801/2021
Decided On : 15-07-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : By Sri Papegowda.B., Adv.
For the Respondent: Sri Manmohan.P.N., Adv.

Point of law :Prevention of corruption -Good laws alone would be not sufficient to make our country corruption free, hut there has to be effective enforcement of the same and efforts should be towards making the concerned accountable. Demanding bribe is a crime so is offering a bribe.

Headnote:

Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 – Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – Sections 13 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 482 – Offence of Corruption – Quashment of FIR – Petitioner who is sole accused in Crime registered by Anti Corruption Bureau (ACB), Chickkaballapura, for offences punishable under Sections 13(l)(b) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 has filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.PC with a prayer to quash FIR and all further proceedings in Crime which is now pending before Court of Principal District & Sessions Judge, Chickkaballapura.

Finding of the Court:

Petitioner is working as a Project Manager of Nirmithi Kendra and nature of work carried on by him will fall within definition of word 'public duty' as defined under P.C.Act. It is now well settled that even if a individual is not a public servant, but if he is discharging "public duty” by virtue of his office, he is answerable to State and public and he comes within ambit of Prevention of Corruption Act – Even if Nirmithi Kenara is not receiving or has not recovered any fund from Central or State Government, but if employees of Kendra by virtue of his office is discharging public duty, then he is answerable to State, Community and public, and can be prosecuted for offences under P.C.Act – Court answer question framed for consideration in affirmative – Corruption to do wrong thing is one thing, but when corruption reaches stage of getting right things done which a citizen is legally entitled for, then very moral fabric of society is destroyed. – Good laws alone would be not sufficient to make our country corruption free, hut there has to be effective enforcement of same and efforts should be towards making concerned accountable – Demanding bribe is a crime so is offering a bribe. – ACB has registered an FIR against petitioner for offences under Sections 13(l)(b) read with 13(2) of P.C.Act, for reason that petitioner is possessing assets disproportionate to his known source of income – Since Nirmithi Kendra wherein petitioner is employed is said to have received funds from Central and State Government, it cannot be but said petitioner is a public servant – Petitioner by virtue of his office is discharging public duty, and therefore, is answerable to State as well as public and even if it can be said that he is not a public servant, he cannot be left out of hook – Criminal petition, therefore, does not merit consideration and petitioner is not entitled for reliefs as prayed for by him.

Result : Criminal petition Dismissed.

ORDER :

1. Corruption hurts everyone. Corruption erodes the trust of a common man in the system. Corruption effects the society, the industry, the economy, the mankind and the nation at large. Corruption has been in existence even during ancient times and it will continue to exist and our vision has to be to curb the same and make our nation corruption free.

2. Petitioner who is the sole accused in Crime No.2/2021 registered by the Anti Corruption Bureau (ACB), Chickkaballapura, for the offences punishable under Sections 13(1)(b) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short, 'P.C.Act'), has filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.PC with a prayer to quash the FIR and all further proceedings in Crime No.2/2021 which is now pending before the Court of Principal District & Sessions Judge, Chickkaballapura.

3. Brief facts of the case as revealed from the records are, petitioner is working as a Project Manager in Nirmithi Kendra, Chikkaballapura Taluk and District, which is a society registered in the year 2008 under the provisions of the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960. The Governing Body of the Nirmithi Kendra comprises of the Deputy Commissioner of the District as the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer of the Zilla Panchayat as the Executive Chairman, Deputy Secretary (Development) of the Zilla Panchayat as the Member Secretary, the Project Manager of Kolar District Nirmithi Kendra, the Executive Engineer, Zilla Panchayat Engineering Division, the District Welfare Officer, Chikkaballapur, the DDPI, Chikkaballapura, the Project Manager, Chickkaballapura Nirmithi Kendra, amongst others as members. The administration of the Kendra is governed by the Governing Body. The principal object of the Kendra is to develop skills in construction and to undertake the civil construction works assigned by the Government.

4. On receipt of a source report that the petitioner who is working as a Project Manager in District Nirmithi Kendra, Chikkaballapura, was possessing disproportionate assets as against the known sources of his income, the Inspector of Police, ACB, Chikkaballapura, had forwarded the said report to the Superintendent of Police, ACB Central Zone, Bengaluru, based on which, FIR in Crime No.2/2021 was registered against the petitioner. Being aggrieved by the same, petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the same.

5. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent-authority has no power to register a case against the petitioner under the provisions of the P.C.Act, for the simple reason that the petitioner is not a public servant. He submits that the petitioner is an employee of Nirmithi Kendra which is a society and the said society has not been receiving any funds either from the State Government or the Central Government. He submits that in identical circumstances, this Court in the case of GOPINATH ALIAS GOPINATHSA VS THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA, BIJAPUR & ANOTHER -2014(4) KCCR 3668, has held that the employee of the Nirmithi Kendra cannot be termed as a public servant, and therefore, had quashed the criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioner therein under the P.C.Act by the Karnataka Lokayukta Police. He submits that the said judgment was challenged by the State before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the special leave petition was dismissed. He also submits that relying upon the judgment in Gopinath's case (supra), a coordinate bench of this Court in Crl.P.No.169/2014 had quashed the entire proceedings in respect of the petitioner therein who was also an employee of the Nirmithi Kendra. He refers to Annexure-D which is a communication issued by the Principal Secretary to the Government, Housing Department, to the President of Bengaluru Nirmithi Kendra, and submits that in the said communication, the request for deputation of employees of the Nirmithi Kendra to other departments of the State was declined on the ground that the emplo

                  Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                  1
                  2
                  3
                  4
                  5
                  6
                  7
                  8
                  9
                  10
                  11
                  SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                  supreme today icon
                  logo-black

                  An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                  Please visit our Training & Support
                  Center or Contact Us for assistance

                  qr

                  Scan Me!

                  India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                  For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                  whatsapp-icon Back to top