M.NAGAPRASANNA
L. DAYANANADA REDDY, S/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH REDDY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE – Respondent
ORDER :
The petitioners in this petition call in question an order passed by the Trial Court in OS No.960/2019 rejecting the application filed by the petitioners seeking refund of Court fee of Rs.2,63,000/-which was paid while instituting the suit in OS No.960/2019.
2. Sans details, brief facts leading to the filing of present petition as borne out from the pleadings are as follows:
The 2nd respondent-defendant instituted a suit for specific performance before the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Rural District, Bengaluru at Bengaluru in OS No.1680/2018. This suit ended in a compromise being recorded by the Court which ended in closure of the suit. The petitioners claiming that fraud was played by the plaintiff therein on the Court while recording the compromise decree which was without their consent, filed another suit in OS No.960/2019 seeking annulment of a compromise decree that was arrived at in OS No.1680/2018.
3. The trial Court, in OS No.960/2019, entertained the suit and also granted a temporary injunction against the second respondent herein who was the plaintiff in OS.No.1680/2018. An application under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC was filed by the plaintiff in OS NO.1680/2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.