B.V.NAGARATHNA, HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
K. SANTHOSHA, S/O LATE K KABBALAIAH – Appellant
Versus
KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KAVERI BHAVAN, BANGALORE – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Though this appeal was listed to consider I.A.No.1/2019 seeking condonation of delay of 174 days in filing the appeal, on condoning the said delay and on disposal of I.A.No.1/2019 (vide separate order), with the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, it is heard finally.
2. The appellant was the petitioner in W.P.No.16400/2015. In that petition, petitioner assailed communication bearing No. xxxxxxxxxxx 15/6884 dated 11.03.2015 addressed to respondent No.4 by respondent No.3 (Annexure-‘B’) and Circular bearing No.KPTCL/B5/721/80-81 dated 23.09.2011 issued by respondent No.1 (Annexure-‘D’) insofar as a portion of clause 2 is concerned, which reads as under:
3. By order dated 15.12.2018, the learned Single Judge rejected the writ petition. Thereafter, Review Petition No.11/2019 was filed. The learned Single Judge dismissed the review petition also. Being aggrieved, the petitioner has assailed the aforesaid orders.
4. Succinctly stated, the facts are, the petitioner/appellant he
Vidhyadhari vs. Sukhrana Bai (2008) 2 SCC 238
State Bank of India vs. Raj Kumar (2010) 11 SCC 661
Rameshwari Devi vs. State of Bihar and Others (2000) 2 SCC 431
Rameshwari Devi [Rameshwari Devi v. State of Bihar
Namita Goldar v. Union of India
State of Chhattisgarh v. Dhirjo Kumar Sengar
Revanasiddappa and another vs. Mallikarjun and Others [(2011) 11 SCC 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.