M.NAGAPRASANNA
P. S. VENKATESH S/O. SANNAIAH – Appellant
Versus
SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI – Respondent
ORDER :
The petitioner in this writ petition calls in question a Movement order dated 08.02.2021 transferring and directing movement of the petitioner from Yelahanka, Bengaluru to Odisha.
2. Brief facts leading to the filing of present petition as borne out from the pleadings are that, the petitioner joined the services of Border Security Force (hereinafter referred to as the ‘BSF’ for short) as a Constable in the year 1984 and at the relevant point in Replaced time was working as an Inspector in BSF. It is pleaded by the petitioner that during his service spanning for about 36 years from 1984 till the passage of the impugned order, has served in various parts of the country. The posting and services rendered by the petitioner throughout his service are as follows:
| “1984 | The petitioner joined the BSF as a Constable. |
| 1985-1987 | Petitioner was posted to work at Delhi. |
| 1987-1989 | Petitioner was posted to work at Tripura. |
| 1989-1991 | Petitioner was posted to work at West Bengal. |
| 1991-1993 | Petitioner was posted to work at Jammu and Kashmir |
| 1993-1996 | |
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan v. Damodar Prasad Pandey reported in (2004) 12 SCC 299
National Hydroelectric Power Corpn. Ltd. v. Shri Bhagwan [(2001) 8 SCC 574 : 2002 SCC (L&S) 21]
N.K. Singh v. Union of India [(1994) 6 SCC 98 : 1994 SCC (L&S) 1304 : (1994) 28 ATC 246]
Rajendra Singh v. State of U.P.
Union of India v. Janardhan Debanath [(2004) 4 SCC 245 : 2004 SCC (L&S) 631]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.