M.NAGAPRASANNA
M. CHANNABASAPPA S/O MRUTHYUNJAYA – Appellant
Versus
GENERAL MANAGER (ADM AND HRD) KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION COMPANY LIMITED – Respondent
ORDER :
Petitioner in Writ Petition No.711 of 2014 calls in question the endorsement dated 24-01-2013 declining to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the cadre of Assistant Executive Engineer from the date on which his juniors were promoted.
In Writ Petition No.10007 of 2020 the very petitioner calls in question an order of penalty imposed upon him on 18-07-2003 and seeks promotion to be granted with retrospective effect and for consequential benefits thereon.
2. Brief facts leading to filing of the present petitions, as borne out from the pleadings in both the writ petitions, are as follows:-
Krishnadevi Malchand Kamathia v. Bombay Environmental Action Group
M. Meenakshi v. Metadin Agarwal [(2006) 7 SCC 470] and Sneh Gupta v. Devi Sarup [(2009) 6 SCC 194]
STATE OF BANK OF INDORE v. GOVINDRAO
Tayabbhai M. Bagasarwalla v. Hind Rubber Industries (P) Ltd. [(1997) 3 SCC 443 : AIR 1997 SC 1240]
UNION OF INDIA v. K.V. JANKIRAMAN reported in (1991) 4 SCC 109
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.