SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Kar) 389

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
Krishna S. Dixit, J.
Smt. Suma, W/o Shyam – Petitioner
Versus
State of Karnataka, Represented by Its Secretary, Department of Home and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No.18978 OF 2021(GM-POLICE)
Decided On : 26-10-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri. Kemparaju, Advocate
For the Respondent: Sri. Vinod Kumar, AGA

Point of Law: Suitable & stringent conditions can be stipulated by the prison authorities themselves; that would assuage this apprehension.

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 – Article 21 – Protection of life and personal liberty - Petitioner is wife of convict who is serving prison sentence for offence of murders; he has made a representation (‘memorandum’) to respondent seeking his release on parole for a period of two months, marriage of daughter having been scheduled to be performed on said representation having not being considered, she is knocking at doors of writ court for its expeditious disposal. - Learned AGA on request having accepted notice for respondents vehemently opposes petition contending that parole & furlough are not a matter of right; petitioner’s husband is convicted for murder of three persons and therefore whatever arguable right he had for parole, also does not avail to him. So contending, he seeks dismissal of writ petition - Having heard learned counsel for parties and having perused petition papers, Court is inclined to grant a restrictive & conditional indulgence in matter.

Finding of the Court:

Writ petition succeeds in part respondents are directed to consider subject representation and release convict on parole/furlough from forenoon of till afternoon of respondents shall stipulate strict conditions as are usually stipulated to ensure return of convict and that he shall not commit any other offence Suitable & stringent conditions can be stipulated by prison authorities themselves; that would assuage apprehension - Court in CHARLES SOBRAJ VS THE SUPTD., CENTRAL JAIL, TIHAR, AIR 1978 SC 1514; after all, standard of civilization is measured by looking to how State and Civil Society treat criminals.- Sublime feelings of spouse & children permeate prison walls and reach out to convict, however strong & unkindly they are built; therefore, court has to facilitate presence & participation of petitioner in ensuing marriage ceremony; an otherwise stand of court, runs risk of being branded as ‘inhuman’ by the right thinking sections of the society, to say the least. - Petitioner’s husband has some blameworthy track record and he may flee away from clutches of law, do not much impress court; it is not that, convict is awarded a capital punishment and therefore he may take a chance to run away from gallows; What George A. Ellis in his book “Inside Folsom Prison” said about nature of convicts is quoted by Apex Court.

Result: Writ petition allowed in part

ORDER :

Petitioner is the wife of the convict who is serving prison sentence for the offence of murders; he has made a representation (‘memorandum’) dated 12.10.2021 to the respondent nos. 2 & 3 seeking his release on parole for a period of two months, the marriage of daughter having been scheduled to be performed on 7th & 8th of November, 2021; the said representation having not being considered, she is knocking at the doors of writ court for its expeditious disposal.

2. Learned AGA on request having accepted notice for the respondents vehemently opposes the petition contending that parole & furlough are not a matter of right; petitioner’s husband is convicted for the murder of three persons and therefore whatever arguable right he had for parole, also does not avail to him. So contending, he seeks dismissal of the writ petition.

3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the petition papers, this Court is inclined to grant a restrictive & conditional indulgence in the matter as under and for the following reasons:

(a) Petitioner in all fairness has disclosed all the material particulars of the cases in which her husband has been convicted & sentenced; presently he has been serving sentence in the gaol for purging the guilt since last more than two decades ie., since 02.03.1999, of course with some parole/furlough; he had violated some parole condition earlier, may be true; however, one cannot forget that every saint had a past and every sinner has a future; the fact that a person is convicted and put behind the bars, does not render him a destitute of all liberty & dignity; in matters like this humanistic approach needs to be adopted qua the convicts; a convict has to keep in contact with the civil society although sporadically, so that his societal roots, do not dry up when he languishes in the jail; otherwise, when he returns from the prison after completing the term of sentence, he may be a total stranger and life may prove hard to him; this is not a happy thing to happen in a Welfare State.

(b) The provisions of parole/furlough are structured on humanistic grounds for the reprieve of those lodged in gaols for long; the main purpose of releasing a serving convict on parole is to afford to him an opportunity to solve his personal & family problems and to enable him to maintain his links with the civil society; there may be cases of health grounds too; the marriage of convict’s younger daughter Chi.S.Monish is scheduled to be performed on 7th & 8th day of November, 2021 at Bastipura, Kollegal; petitioner has produced the Marriage Invitation Card at Annexure-L; ordinarily every Hindu Marriage involves certain rituals such as ‘Vivaah Homa’ & ‘Kanyadaan’ that are done with the participation of the parents; even otherwise, when a young daughter is getting married, the presence of her father, is desirable, consistent with the humanitarian considerations which inhere in Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

(c) It was Oscar Wilde in a stanza of his poem “The Ballard of Reading Gaol” who lamented about the prison life as under :

“This too I know …. And wise it were

If each could know the same …

That every prison that men build

Is built with bricks of shame,

And bound with bars lest Christ should see

How men their brothers maim”.

“Compassion wherever possible and cruelty only where inevitable, is the art of correctional confinement”, said the Apex Court in CHARLES SOBRAJ VS THE SUPTD., CENTRAL JAIL, TIHAR, 1978 AIR 1514; after all, the standard of civilization is measured by looking to how the State and Civil Society treat the criminals. The sublime feelings of the spouse & children permeate the prison walls and reach out to the convict, however strong & unkindly they are built; therefore, this court has to facilitate the presence & participation of the petitioner in the ensuing marriage ceremony; an otherwise stand of the court, runs the risk of being branded as ‘inhuman’ by the right thinking sections of the so

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top