Back
2021 Supreme(Kar) 412
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
P.KRISHNA BHAT, J.
SRI. M. VENKATACHALAM - APPELLANT
Vs.
SRI. MUKESH GUPTA - RESPONDENTS
R.F.ANo.385 OF 2017
Decided on : 12-03-2021
For the Appellant : SRI.A.VIJAYA SAI
For the Respondent: SRI.K.N.SHIVAREDDY
Headnote:
Constitution of India,1950 - Counsel for appellant is absent.
Finding of the court : In spite of sufficient opportunities office objections have not been complied with - Appellant does not seem to be interested in prosecuting appeal –
Result : Appeal is dismissed
JUDGMENT :
This appeal is of the year 2017.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. No representation.
3. In spite of sufficient opportunities, office objections have not been complied with. The appellant does not seem to be interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
