IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
KRISHNA S.DIXIT, J.
MOHAMMED MUSHTAQ G K, S/O KHADER HUSSAIN - Appellant
Vs.
AYESHA BANU, W/O MOHAMMED MUSHTAQ G K - Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO.16885 OF 2021(GM-FC)
Decided On : 21-12-2021
Guardians and Wards Act - Section 12 - Custody of a minor child - Visitation rights - Parties are Sunni Muslims; both they are highly educated; they have a greater exposure to the outer world; petitioner – husband, is well placed in employ of an MNC; their nikah was solemnized; a child is born; however, because of apparent temperamental differences, their marriage has broken down and *respondent’s suit in O.S. for decree of its dissolution is pending; it hardly needs to be stated that *respondent’s suit for dissolution of marriage being pending, it is open to *petitioner-husband to file a Counter Claim too.
Finding of the Court :
If wife can stay away from the matrimonial home on ground of second marriage, it goes without saying that she can normally retain exclusive custody of her minor child - Respondent wife graciously agreed to give up all allegations made against petitioner, for buying peace; she also agreed to put an end to criminal cases as well and asked this court to quash them straightaway; however, petitioner was unjustifiably adamant and stuck to his guns, though he has been happily residing with second wife and child begotten from her; the respondent has been bringing up the child single handedly, though facing the cases filed by the petitioner; more is not necessary to specify.
Result : Writ petition dismissed
ORDER :
This is a legal battle between the estranged spouses for the custody of a minor child. petitioner, being the husband of respondent is knocking at the doors of Writ Court for assailing the order dated 17.12.2018, a copy whereof is at Annexure-E whereby, the learned IV Addl. Family Court Judge, Bangalore, having rejected his application in I.A.No.3 for custody of the child in his G & WC No.77/2017; however, has accorded visitation rights to the petitioner.
2. The operative portion of the impugned order reads as under:
I.A.No.3 filed by the petitioner under section 12 of Guardians and Wards Act is rejected.
However, the petitioner is granted visitation rights/parenting time on 1st and 3rd Saturdays of every month from 11.30 a.m. to 3.30 p.m. at Bengaluru Mediation Center in respect of the minor child Mohammed Shahraan Hussain.
The respondent is directed to bring the child to Bengaluru Mediation Center on 1st and rd Saturdays of every month and handover the child to the petitioner at 11.30 a.m. The petitioner after exercising his visitation rights/parenting time, shall return the child to the respondent at 3.30p.m.”
3. After service of notice, the respondent wife having entered appearance in person, opposes the Petition making submission in justification of the impugned order and the reasons on which it has been structured; she also narrates several tormenting acts allegedly perpetrated by the petitioner and the same eventually leading to the breakdown of marriage, despite there being a pretty child.
4. BRIEF FACTS:
| *Corrected Vide Chamber Order Dated 23.12.2021 |
(i) “Divorce petition in O.S.No.154/2016 pending before 6th Addl. Family court at Bangalore.
(ii) G & WC.No.77/2017 pending before 6th Addl. Family Court at Bangalore.
(iii) C.Misc.53/2017 pending before 6th MMTC at Bangalore.
(iv) Defamation Suit O.S.No.8743/2017 pending before CCH-65 at Bangalore.
(v) C.C.No.27620/2018 pending before 2nd ACMM at Bangalore.
(vi) C.C.No.29577/2019 pending before 4th ACMM at Bangalore.
(vii) C.C.No.26059/2018 pending before 32nd ACMM at Bangalore.
(viii) Crl.Pet.No.721/2019 before this Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore.”
(C) It is also relevant to state that after the marriage, this couple had resided in the State of Arizona in US for some time; petitioner is extensively traveled; he has espoused a second lady and that a child too is begotten from the second marriage; admittedly, he has been residing with the second wife and a female child begotten from her; he admits that he is happily living; the second spouse has given an Affidavit that the child from the first marriage should come & stay with this family.
(D) Petitioner has filed the subject G&WC seeking exclusive custody of the child inter alia contending that it is desirable to bring up the child in his exclusive custody since “he is in a better position to take care of his child from a financial perspective and provide him the best upbringing education and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.