SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 43

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD BENCH
H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRY, J.
Shri Rakeshkumar S/o Satpal Girdhar – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Karnataka – Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 102355 of 2021
Decided On : 19-01-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mahantesh Mathad, Mrutyunjay Tata Bangi.
For the Respondent: Ramesh B. Chigari.

Point of Law: Amended Section 2(7) with Section 78(1)(a) of KP Act now makes it very clear that, wagering or betting by collecting money from the public upon an uncertain result of a game or an event including a game of skill, would fall under Section 78(1)(a) of KP act.

Headnote:

Karnataka Police Act, 1963 - Sections 2(7), 78(1)(a)(vi) and 80 - Karnataka Police (Amendment) Act, 2021 - Section 78(1)(a)(vi) - Opening, etc. of certain forms of gaming - Petitioners, who are arraigned as accused Nos. 1 to 3 in respondent No. 1-Police Station in Crime for offence punishable under Sections 78(1)(a)(vi) and 80 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963 have sought for quashing of said criminal proceedings against them.

Finding of the Court:

As per complaint, not less than 7 cell phones were recovered which were alleged to have been used by accused for purpose of cricket betting - According to complaint, present petitioners, as accused, were collecting money from public on assurance of giving double the amount if they succeed in betting. For said purpose, those cell phones were said to have been being used and they were getting an access to a particular WEB site for the said purpose - According to complainant, a note book recording the receipt of money from the public, a ball point pen and two motorcycles were also seized - In addition to this, some amount in cash, from each of accused, which in total amounted to a sum was also said to have been recovered from spot under the same panchanama it cannot be said that prima facie, no case is made out though contended by petitioners - As such, argument of counsel for petitioners that, allegations made in complaint, though, taken as true, would not make out a prima facie case against petitioners, is not acceptable.

Result: Petition stands dismissed.

ORDER :

1. The present petitioners, who are arraigned as accused Nos. 1 to 3 in respondent No. 1-Police Station in Crime No. 100/2021 for the offence punishable under Sections 78(1)(a)(vi) and 80 of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963 (hereinafter for brevity referred to as ‘KP Act’) have sought for quashing of the said criminal proceedings against them.

2. The summary of the case of the prosecution is that, based on a credible information that accused/petitioners herein were involved in cricket betting and gambling, the respondent No. 2, joined by the panchas and duly supported by the permission of his superior authorities and the permission granted by the Court for search and seizure, has proceeded on 10.11.2021, at 9.45 p.m. to a house near Danammadevi temple of Kunchanur road in Jamakhandi town. Parking their official jeep at a distance, the raiding team observed that, three persons sitting in a house said to be of Sri. Kallappa Singadi, were viewing their cell phones (mobile phones) and one among them, was collecting money from the public and noting down something in the note book. Suspecting the cricket betting, the raiding team surrounded them, however, the people who were paying money to the alleged bookies, ran away from the place. The present petitioners who were collecting money from the public and noting down in a note book and also making use of cell phone were caught hold. From their possession, not less than eight cell phones, a note book, a ball point pen, two motorcycles and a cash amount of Rs. 1,55,500/- collected from the people on betting were seized by drawing a seizure panchanama in the spot. The raiding Police Officer after returning to the police station, lodged a complaint which was registered in respondent No. 1 Police Station in their station Crime No. 100/2021 against the present petitioners for the above mentioned offences.

3. Learned High Court Government Pleader is appearing for the respondents.

4. Though this matter was listed for admission, however, with the consent from both side, the matter is taken up for its final disposal on merit.

5. Heard argument from both side.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioners in his argument submitted that even according to the complaint, the accused were making use of a WEB site with the name ICEEXCH-IO and they were only viewing the mobile phone. No money in cash was recovered from the petitioners. There is nothing to suggest that they were involved in the act of gaming or gambling, as such, the alleged offences are not made out.

7. Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader submitted that by virtue of the amended definition of ‘gaming’ and amendment to Section 78(1)(a)(vi) of the KP Act, the act of the accused squarely falls within the ambit of the online gaming and betting. As such, a prima facie case is made out against the accused and a trial is required to be followed after due investigation.

8. The alleged crime is registered for the offence under Section 78(1)(a)(vi) and Section 80 of KP Act. The amended Section 78(1)(a)(vi) of the Karnataka Police (Amendment) Act, 2021, reads as below:

    “78. Opening, etc. of certain forms of gaming:

(1) Whoever:

(a) being the owner or occupier or having the use of any building, room, tent, enclosure, vehicle, vessel or place, or at cyber cafe or online gaming involving wagering or betting including computer resource or mobile application or internet or any communication device as defined in the Information Technology Act, 2000 (Central Act 21 of 2000) opens, keeps or uses the same for the purpose of gaming:

(i) xxx xxx xxx

(ii) xxx xxx xxx

(iii) xxx xxx xxx

(iv) xxx xxx xxx

(v) xxx xxx xxx

(vi) on any transaction or scheme of wagering or betting in which the receipt or distribution of winnings or prizes in money or otherwise is made to depend on chance or skill of other.”

9. A reading of the amended Section 78(1)(a)(vi) of KP (Amendment) Act, 2021, makes it clear that, online gaming involving wagering or betting including computer res

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top