SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 48

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
RITU RAJ AWASTHI, SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, JJ.
BIBI AYESHA KHANUM W/O BABA ABDUL NABI KHAN - Appellant
Vs.
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE NEW DELHI & ORS. - Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO.2318 OF 2022 (GM-POLICE)
Decided On : 23-02-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :SRI. ROHAN KOTHARI, ADVOCATE
For the Respondent:SRI. KUMAR.M.N, CGC, SMT. VANI.H, AGA, SRI. SHRIDHAR PRABHU, ADVOCATE.

Point of Law : When the proceedings under the POCSO Act also involve offences under Sections 376(3), 376-AB, 376-DA or 376-DB of the Indian Penal Code, the notice to the victim shall be issued under Section 439(1-A) read with Rule 4(13) and 4(15).

Headnote:

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 438 and 439 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 - 376 (AB), 376 (DA), 376 (DB) - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 21 - Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act 2012 - Section 40 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Rules, 2020 - Rule 4 – Bail application - Right of child to take assistance of legal practitioner - Punishment for rape on woman under twelve years of age - Punishment for gang rape on woman under sixteen years of age - Punishment for gang rape on woman under twelve years of age - Petitioners is that in prosecution for offences under POCSO Act when accused were to move Court for grant of bail, defacto complainant and/or caregiver of minor victim are not informed of application filed for bail.

Finding of the Court:

benefit of Article 21 of constitution is not only available to accused but also to victims and their families of any criminal offence - For an orderly society to exist it is but required that victims of criminal offences more particularly heinous offences have a say in criminal prosecution of accused -Though prosecution of such offences rests with State, who is to act impartially, prosecution system is overburdened, many a time prosecutors not having been appointed, leading to inordinate delay - If a victim or complainant wants to and can effectively assist prosecution, same is required to be permitted, albeit with caveat that prosecutor would always be in charge of prosecution and would be deciding authority as regards mode and manner of conducting of prosecution - For this to happen it is essential that complainant/Victim is aware of proceedings in court.

Result: Writ Petition stands disposed.

ORDER :

1. Sri.M.N.Kumar, learned CGSC accepts notice for respondent No.1. Smt.H.Vani, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents No.2 and 3. Sri.Shridhar Prabhu, learned counsel accepts notice for respondent No.4.

2. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

    a. Issue directions to Respondents to ensure effective implementation of the POCSO Act, 2012 and the POCSO Rules, 2020.

b. Declare that Section 40 of the POCSO Act read with Rule 4 of the POCSO Rules mandates that the child victim/parent/guardian/complainant as the case may be shall be informed through the issuance of a notice regarding any application for bail preferred by an accused person.

c. Declare that Section 40 of the POCSO Act read with Rule 4 of the POCSO Rules mandates that the legal representative of the child victim/parent or guardians/complainant as the case may be, is heard before granting of bail to the accused;

d. Issue directions to the effect that all the relevant documents required for the victim/complainant/informant to effectively represent themselves during hearing of bail applications filed by the accused shall be provided to them by the concerned police or SJPU;

e. Issue directions to all criminal courts to exercise their jurisdiction with a view to secure efficient and effective participation of child victims/their caregivers through their legal representatives at all stages of the judicial process;

f. Issue directions to Respondents No.1 to 3 to ensure that the interests of child victims of sexual abuse/their families are protected with particular reference to Section 40 of the POCSO Act and Rule 4 of the POCSO Rules;

g. Issue directions to the effect that in cases where child sexual offences have been perpetrated by a close family member, a notice regarding filing of bail application by an accused also be issued by the concerned police or SJPU the concerned Child Welfare Committee and a copy of such notice/information be also sent to Respondent No.4;

h. Direct Respondents No.3 and 4 to develop a mechanism to monitor compliance of Section 40 of the POCSO Act, Rule 4 of the POCSO Rules;

i. Pass any other orders/directions that this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the present case.

3. In this Public Interest Litigation, the petitioners are seeking for effective implementation of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act 2012 (‘POCSO Act’ for short) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Rules, 2020 (‘POCSO Rules’ for short) as also the amended provisions of Section 438 and 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

4. The grievance of the petitioners is that in prosecution for offences under the POCSO Act when the accused were to move the Court for grant of bail, the defacto complainant and/or caregiver of the minor victim are not informed of the application filed for bail, thereby an opportunity to the complainant/victim or informants/caregiver to place their contentions and/or oppose an application for bail is denied.

5. The petitioners are stated to be mothers of children who have been subjected to sexual offences punishable under the POCSO Act, the petitioners being the complainants or informants in the complaints registered under the provisions of POCSO Act, the petitioners being the complainants or informants in the complaints registered under the provisions of the POCSO Act have gone through an harrowing time inasmuch as in the proceedings which had been initiated against the accused, the petitioners were not provided with an opportunity to object to the same and as such the accused having been granted bail without consideration of any objections that they had. It is with an intention that similar situations are not faced by the mothers who are the complainants or informants and/or other complainants and informants in POCSO matters that the present petition has been filed.

6. It is the contention of the petitioners that any orders that may be passed in the

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top