RITU RAJ AWASTHI, SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
BIBI AYESHA KHANUM W/O BABA ABDUL NABI KHAN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE NEW DELHI – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Sri.M.N.Kumar, learned CGSC accepts notice for respondent No.1. Smt.H.Vani, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents No.2 and 3. Sri.Shridhar Prabhu, learned counsel accepts notice for respondent No.4.
2. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
b. Declare that Section 40 of the POCSO Act read with Rule 4 of the POCSO Rules mandates that the child victim/parent/guardian/complainant as the case may be shall be informed through the issuance of a notice regarding any application for bail preferred by an accused person.
c. Declare that Section 40 of the POCSO Act read with Rule 4 of the POCSO Rules mandates that the legal representative of the child victim/parent or guardians/complainant as the case may be, is heard before granting of bail to the accused;
d. Issue directions to the effect that all the relevant documents required for the victim/complainant/informant to effectively represent themselves during hearing of bail applications filed by the accused shall be provided to them by the concerned poli
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.