SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Kar) 576

ALOK ARADHE, HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
Poornima – Appellant
Versus
M. Chandrashekar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :B.S. Srinivasa, Advocate
For the Respondents:B.S. Krishna, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Hemant Chandangoudar, J.

1. This appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', for short) is filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of the amount of compensation against the judgment dated 28.07.2018 passed by the Senior Civil Judge & MACT, Tirumakudalu Narasipura in MVC No. 407/2016

2. Facts giving rise to the filing of the appeal briefly stated are that on 12.01.2015, the deceased Suresh who was traveling in a car bearing registration No. KA-55-M-3474 along with his inmates which was driven by its driver Shreyas dashed against the lorry bearing Registration No. TN-34-B-4204, which was parked in the middle of the road without any sign and signal. As a result of the aforesaid accident, Suresh sustained grievous injuries and succumbed to the same.

3. The claimants thereupon filed a petition under Section 163A of the Act claiming compensation on the ground that the deceased was aged about 45 years at the time of accident and was an agriculturist and earning a sum of Rs. 40,000/- per month. It was further pleaded that accident took place solely on account of negligence on the part of the driver of the lorry who had parked

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top