JYOTHI MULIMANI
M. Narayanaswamy – Appellant
Versus
M. Narayanappa – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Jyothi Mulimani, J.
1. Unsuccessful legal representatives of defendant 2 have appealed this appeal challenging the judgment and decree passed in OS. No. 3119/1993.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rankings before the Trial Court.
3. The short facts are these: Defendant 1 and plaintiffs and are the members of the Joint Hindu Undivided Family. Defendant 1 is the father of plaintiffs 1 and 2. The land bearing Sy. No. 63/5 of Nagashettyhalli Village, Kasaba Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk, Bangalore is a Joint Hindu Undivided property and the said property is the ancestral property of defendant 1 and plaintiffs. The katha of the said property stands in the name of Late Munichannaiah, who was the father of defendant 1 and grandfather of plaintiffs.
Suffice it to mention that defendant 1 and plaintiffs are the absolute owners of the land bearing Sy. No. 63/5 of Nagashettyhalli Village, Kasaba Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk, Bangalore, and they are in joint possession and enjoyment of same. It is averred that revenue sites are formed by defendant 1 as well as plaintiffs 1 and 2, in the said land. One of such site is Site No. 25. Plaintiffs stated t
Subodhkumar and Others v. Bhagwant Namdeo Rao Mehetre and Others
Name Rama Murthy v. Ravula Somasundaram and Others
State of Punjab and Another v. Balkaran Singh
Vidhyadhar v. Manikrao and Another
Nandkishore Lalbhai Mehta v. New Era Fabrics Private Limited and Others
Sudarshari Prasad and Others v. Radha Kishun Ram (deceased) by L.Rs
Thamma Venkata Subbamma (dead) by L.R. v. Thamma Rattamma and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.