SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Kar) 553

H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
Santhosh – Appellant
Versus
Byregowda – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :T. Parameshwarappa, Advocate
For the Respondent:P.B. Raju, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD, J.

1. This appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', for short) has been filed by the claimants being aggrieved by the judgment dated 2.2.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.

2. Facts giving rise to the filing of the appeal briefly stated are that on 31.8.2011 the deceased Durgaram was proceeding on his TVS moped bearing No. KA-52-H-2574 in NH4 and when he reached near Goraguntepalya junction, at that time, a lorry bearing registration No. KA-02-D-3369 which was being driven in a rash and negligent manner, dashed against the deceased. As a result of the aforesaid accident, the deceased sustained grievous injuries and succumbed to the injuries.

3. The claimants filed a petition under Section 166 of the Act on the ground that the deceased was aged about 37 years at the time of accident and was employed as salesman and was earning Rs. 8,000/- p.m. The claimants claimed compensation along with interest.

4. On service of summons, the respondent No. 2 appeared through Counsel and filed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top