SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Kar) 625

S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
National Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Narasimhamurthy M. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Geetha Raj, Advocate
For the Respondent:C. Puttaswamy, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR, J.

1. M.F.A. No. 6420/2018 is preferred by the Insurance company against the impugned judgment and award dated 14.03.2018 passed in MVC No. 2346/2017, whereby the Tribunal awarded compensation in a sum of Rs. 9,24,100/- together with interest at 7.5% p.a. on account of the injuries sustained by the claimant in a road traffic accident that occurred on 09.12.2016. M.F.A. Crob. No. 136/2018 is filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of compensation.

2. By the impugned judgment and award, the Tribunal allowed the claim petition and directed the Insurance Company to pay compensation in favour of the claimant.

3. I have heard learned Counsel for appellant-Insurance company, learned Counsel for cross-objector-claimant and perused the material on record.

4. In addition to re-iterating the various grounds and contentions urged in the memorandum of appeal and referring to the material on record, learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the Tribunal committed an error in directing the Insurance Company to pay compensation in favour of the claimant without

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top