SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Kar) 630

P.N.DESAI
Revansiddappa – Appellant
Versus
Neelamma Sanganna Malipatil Kalagi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : G.S. Biradar
For the Respondent: C.A. Sugoor

JUDGMENT :

P.N. DESAI, J.

1. This appeal lays challenge to the judgment dated 26.08.2009 passed by the learned IV Addl. District Judge, Gulbarga in R.A. No. 116/2006, wherein the appeal filed by the plaintiff against the judgment and decree in O.S. No. 246/2001 dated 10.06.2006 is allowed.

2. The appellant was defendant No. 2 before the trial court and respondent No. 1 was the plaintiff before the trial court. Respondent No. 3 is defendant No. 3 before the trial court.

3. The parties will be referred as 'plaintiff and 'defendants' as per their respective ranks before the trial court.

4. The brief case of the plaintiff before trial court is that the plaintiff is sister of defendant No. 1. Suit properties bearing Sy. No. 93, Hissa No. 1/1 measuring 8 acres 15 guntas and house property bearing No. 1-92/1 are situated at Itga (K) Tq. Gulbarga, are the ancestral properties of their father. Their father Omkarappa was in possession and enjoyment of the properties. Thereafter, he died. Plaintiff and defendant No. 1 are the only legal heirs and both of them have got equal share in the suit properties. There is no family partition between plaintiff and defendant No. 1. The defendant No. 1 without

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top