H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
Kamala N. – Appellant
Versus
Satisha K. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
H.B. Prabhakara Sastry, J.
The present petitioners are also the petitioners in Criminal Misc.No.398/2013, on the file of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court at Tumkur (hereinafter for brevity referred to as the Family Court) which was filed by them against the present respondent under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (hereinafter for brevity referred to as the Cr.P.C.), praying for maintenance at the rate of Rs. 10,000/- per month to each of them from the respondent.
The Family Court by its impugned judgment dated 04-02-2016, partly allowed the petition, wherein it dismissed the petition of petitioner No.1- wife and partly allowed the petition of petitioner No.2 - son and the respondent - husband was directed to pay maintenance to the petitioner No.2 at the rate of Rs. 2,000/- per month. Being not satisfied with the said judgment, the petitioners in the Family Court have preferred this revision petition, wherein the petitioner No.1 has sought for allowing her petition as prayed and petitioner No.2 has prayed for enhancement of maintenance ordered in his favour and for an order as prayed in his petition.
2. Xxx xxx xxx
3. In spite of service of notice
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.