SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Kar) 489

ALOK ARADHE, NATARAJ RANGASWAMY
Chandrashekar – Appellant
Versus
Divisional Office, The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Anil Kumar M., Advocate
For the Respondents:K.K. Vasanth, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Nataraj Rangaswamy, J.

1. Though this appeal is listed today for orders, the same is taken up for final disposal with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties.

2. This appeal is filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the M.A.C.T. at Bengaluru (SCCH-09) (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') in M.V.C. No. 6705/2011 in terms of the judgment and award dated 19.11.2013. Parties will henceforth be referred to as they were arrayed before the Tribunal.

3. The claim petition disclosed that on 13.07.2011, the claimant was traveling in a bus bearing Registration No. KA-18-F-393 (henceforth referred to as 'the offending vehicle') which dashed against a parked lorry bearing Registration No. MH-06-AQ-7911 at about 11.45 p.m., near Attibele Check post. The claimant was shifted to Hosmat Hospital, Bengaluru where he underwent treatment. The claimant alleged negligence on behalf of the offending vehicle and filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 claiming compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/- from the owner and i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top