ORDER :

Shankar Ganapathi Pandit, J.

1. Even though the matter is listed for orders, with the consent of learned Counsel for both the parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal.

2. The petitioner is before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of certiorari to quash the notice dated 04.12.2020 bearing No. BBMP/Sakala/HOUV/PO/71/2020-21 issued by the 1st respondent-Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (for short 'the BBMP') under Section 321(1) and (2) of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 (for short 'the Act').

3. This Court passed interim order dated 14.12.2020 staying the impugned notice dated 04.12.2020 and all further proceedings thereto and restrained the respondents from precipitating the matter, till the next date of hearing.

4. Heard Miss Nayana Tara, learned Counsel for Sri G.L. Vishwanath, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri K.N. Puttegowda, learned Counsel for respondents 1 and 2 through video conference and Sri K. Krishna, learned Counsel for respondent No. 3-Bangalore Development Authority (for short 'the BDA').

5. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner is before this Court assailing the n