IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J.
Bhagyashree D D/O K.Sanjeeva – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Karnataka Represented By Its Secretary Department Of Energy Vikasa Soudha - Respondent
Writ Petition No.14591/2015 (S – RES)
Decided on : 24-05-2021
Constitution of India, 1950 – Articles 14, 16, 21 – Equality before law – Writ petition have sought following prayers – Petitioners were all applicants in a 2nd recruitment process initiated by respondent/KPTCL and other ESCOMS to post of Assistant Lineman – Petitioners were all recruited through five notifications issued – It appears that KPTCL issued a notification amending Recruitment and Promotion Regulations by creating a new cadre – Junior Meter Reader – Held, With regard to other prayer that is sought in writ petition for a direction by issuance of a writ in nature of mandamus directing respondents to consider representation for stepping up of their pay in cadre of Assistant Lineman either on par with Junior Meter Reader or above Junior Meter Reader by two scales owing to their educational qualification is concerned, it is not in dispute that respondent/KPTCL has not considered representation on ground that the writ petition is pending consideration at the hands of this Court – Therefore, KPTCL is at liberty to consider the representation in accordance with law – Except the aforesaid observations none of the grounds urged sound acceptance – Writ petition dismissed.
ORDER :
1. Petitioners in this writ petition have sought the following prayers:
(b) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 11-02-2014 produced at Annexure-K and consider the cases of the petitioners for stepping up of their pay in the cadre of Assistant Lineman above that of the Junior Meter Readers pay scales at least 2 stages higher having regard additional educational qualification prescribed for them ever since the date of their appointment and grant them all the consequential benefits to meet the ends of justice.
And
(c) Pass such other orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case, including the award of the costs of this petition, in the interest of justice and equity.”
2. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present petition, as borne out from the pleadings, are as follows:-
The petitioners were all applicants in a 2nd recruitment process initiated by the respondent/KPTCL and other ESCOMS to the post of Assistant Lineman. The petitioners were all recruited through five notifications issued from the year 1998 to 2008. It appears that on 26-03-2007 the KPTCL issued a notification amending the Recruitment and Promotion Regulations by creating a new cadre – Junior Meter Reader. Educational qualification prescribed for the said post in terms of the said amendment was SSLC. It further transpires that KPTCL prescribed to the said post a higher pay scale to that of the petitioners which according to the petitioners is not in consonance with the educational qualification possessed.
3. The petitioners’ claim to be in possession of higher qualification and doing more onerous and strenuous job than that of the Junior Meter Reader, which post was created on 26.03.2007 but allege that Junior Meter Reader is given higher pay scale than that of the petitioners despite doing a desk job. The grievance of the petitioners as pleaded are as follows:-
(b) The difference in pay scale in the cadre of Assistant Linemen with SSLC+ITI/ITC qualification is Rs.7950-150-8100-190-9050-240-10250-300-11750-360-16790 whereas the pay scale prescribed to the post of Junior Meter Reader with only SLC qualification is Rs.8480-190-9050-240-10250-300-11750-360-13910-420-16850-510-18890-570-20600.
(c) A candidate who is appointed under fortuitous circumstances is in a better advantageous position with lesser educational qualification over the educationally better qualified Assistant Lineman in respect of pay and in respect of promotional avenues.
(d) 975 Junior Meter Readers get 20% of the vacancies in the cadre of Meter Reader, Operator and Overseer numbering 4827 vacancies, whereas 10,177 Lineman get only 30% of the vacancies and the Assistant Lineman have to get promoted to the post of Lineman and Mechanic Grade-II and wait for several years. Hence, Junior Meter Readers are in an advantageous position compared to the Lineman cadre which is the basic feeder cadre to the post of Meter Reader and other equivalent posts.
(e) An Assistant Lineman is required to earn 2 promotions to go to the cadre of Meter Reader, whereas Junior Meter Reader get immediate promotion on completion of 4 years of service. An Assistant Lineman has to wait for more than a year to get a promotion to the post of Lineman depending on the vacancies.
4. Heard Sri. Narayana Bhat, learned counsel for the petitioners; Smt. Nagashree, learned Additional Government Advocate for respo
Chandigarh Administration v. Usha Kheterpal Waie – reported in (2011) 9 SCC 645
Ranga Swamy v. Govt. of A.P. [(1990) 1 SCC 288: 1990 SCC (L&S) 76]
State Of Gujarat v. Arvindkumar T.TIWARI – reported in (2012) 9 SCC 545
State of Haryana v. Subash Chander Mar-waha [(1974) 3 SCC 220:1973 SCC (L&S) 488:AIR 1973 SC 2216]
J.C. Yadav v. State of Haryana [(1990) 2 SCC 189:1990 SCC (L&S) 218:(1990) 12 ATC 745]
Ashok Kumar Uppal v. State of J&K [(1998) 4 SCC 179: 1998 SCC (L&S) 1055]
State of M.P. v. Dharam Bir [(1998) 6 SCC 165: 1998 SCC (L&S) 1459]
State of J&K v. Shiv Ram Sharma [(1999) 3 SCC 653: 1999 SCC (L&S) 801: AIR 1999 SC 2012]
Praveen Singh v. State of Punjab [(2000) 8 SCC 633: 2001 SCC (L&S) 62]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.