SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Kar) 476

M.G.UMA
Mohammed Ashraf – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka, By Inspector of Police – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. Nataraja Ballal.A., Adv.
For the Respondent: Sri. Vinayaka V.S., HCGP

ORDER :

1. The revision petitioner is accused No.1 in C.C.No.77/2010 before the learned III Additional Senior Civil Judge & JMFC., Mangaluru, Dakshina Kannada (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Trial Court’). He is challenging the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.09.2011 convicting him for the offences punishable under Sections 279 and 304A of IPC and under Section 181 of MV Act and sentencing him to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month for the offence punishable under Section 279 of IPC and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/-and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 15 days and to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months for the offence punishable under Section 304A of IPC and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/-and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month and to pay fine of Rs.500/-for the offence punishable under Section 181 of MV Act and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 15 days.

2. Brief facts of the case, as made out by the prosecution, are that, the revision petitioner/accused No.1, being the rider of the motorcycle bea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top