JUDGMENT :

JYOTI MULIMANI, J.

1. Sri. Varadarajan M.S. learned counsel for appellant and Sri. V. Rangaramu, learned counsel for proposed respondent No. 1 (1 to 4) have appeared through video conferencing.

2. This is an appeal from the Court of Senior Civil Judge and C.J.M. Chamrajnagar.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking in the trial Court.

4. A Suit was filed for a decree of permanent injunction with respect to the suit schedule property.

5. The plaint averments are as under:

Plaintiff has stated that the suit schedule property originally belonged to his grandfather Venkatashetty. He had executed a sale deed on 23.06.1928 with respect to the suit property in favor of one Chennashetty. That there was also a re-conveyance agreement. Accordingly, Chennashetty executed a document on 06.06.1948. It is stated that Chennashetty returned the original sale deed dated 23.06.1928 to Venkatashetty and also received back the sale consideration amount mentioned in the sale deed from Venkatashetty and he was also put back in possession of the suit schedule property and the same was in the enjoyment of Venkatashetty.

After the death of Venkatashetty, plaintif