B.V.NAGARATHNA, HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
Bangalore Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Munianjanappa, S/o Buddappa/Buddanna – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
There is delay of 585 days in filing the appeal.
Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the delay has occurred due to bona-fide and unintentional reasons. In that regard he drew our attention to IA No.1/2018 filed by the appellant seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal. He submitted that the appellant- Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) has a good case on merits and therefore, delay may be condoned and the matter may be heard on merits.
2. Briefly stated the facts are that the respondents/writ petitioners had filed Writ Petition Nos.37184-200/2016, seeking a writ of mandamus against the appellants herein to execute sale deeds in respect of the petition schedule property which had been allotted in favour of the petitioners as per Annexures-A to A15 vide allotment orders dated 09.02.2016, 11.02.0216 and 15.03.2016. In all, 15 sites, totally measuring around 39,289 square feet were allotted by the appellant/BDA in favour of the respondents/writ petitioners. The said allotment was made in lieu of utilization of respondents’ land to an extent of 36 guntas in Sy.No.84/1 of Valagerahalli Village, Kengeri Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk. The said land belonged
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.