IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
K.S.MUDAGAL, J.
Aslam Khan S/o Wasim Khan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.296 of 2011
Decided on : 12-02-2021
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 498A, 302, 307, 304 Part I – Appeal - Attempt to murder – Offence of Murder - Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty - Whether injuries were suicidal or homicidal - Whether victim gave the dying declaration as per Ex.P10 before Govindaiah who was deputed by PW.15 - PW.15 states that he deputed the Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police to hospital to record the statement of victim – Held, PW.2 uncle, PW.1 cousin were living in same place - Their evidence that couple were living in Janatha colony and the victim was struggling to feed her children show that they were economically weak - Under the circumstances, in matrimonial matters efforts of relatives and parents would be to reconcile the couple and not to rush to Police Station - Therefore, their evidence regarding cruelty cannot be rejected only on the ground that no complaint was filed earlier regarding harassment - PWs.3 to 6 though turned hostile, regarding cruelty of accused to victim, were consistent in their evidence that at the time of the incident, the accused was in the house and when they rushed to the spot on hearing commotion, they found the victim aflame - As per their evidence, it was they who shifted the victim to the hospital and the accused did not take any part in that - As already pointed out, the accused did not report the matter to the police - He did not attend to her medical needs and he had not suffered any injuries on his hands if at all injuries were suicidal, in the normal course he should have attempted to rescue her - Appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Aggrieved by the order of conviction and sentence passed against him for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 304 Part I of IPC, the accused has preferred the above appeal.
2. The appellant was prosecuted in S.C.No.59/2008 on the file of the District and Sessions Judge, Ramanagara for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 302 of IPC on the basis of the charge sheet filed by Ramanagara Town police in Crime No.25/2008 of their Police Station. For the purpose of convenience, the appellant will be referred to henceforth as accused.
3. The accused was married to Gulnaz Khanam on 07.02.2002. Both of them were living in the house situated at Janatha Colony, Rehamaniya Nagara, Ramanagara. Out of the said wed lock, couple had two sons and one daughter. PW.9 is the father, PW.2 is uncle and PW.1 is the cousin of Gulnaz Khanam. PWs.3 to 6 were her neighbours in marital home. Prior to marriage and even after marriage Gulnaz Khanam worked in Silk filature.
4. On 10.03.2008 at 10.45 p.m. Gulnaz Khanam suffered burns in the house of the accused. Immediately she was taken to General hospital, Ramanagara. During the same night, she was shifted to Victoria Hospital, Bengaluru. On 14.03.2008 at 5.00 a.m. she succumbed to burn injuries
5. The case of the prosecution in brief was as follows:
(ii) Accordingly, Govindaiah visited Victoria Hospital and issued requisition as per Ex.P9;
(iii) PW.10 the Casualty Medical Officer of Victoria Hospital was enquired whether that the victim was in a condition to give the statement. PW.10 found her in a position to give statement and on his certification Govindaiah recorded the victim’s statement as per Ex.P10, returned to the police station and submitted the same to PW.15;
(iv) On that basis, PW.15 registered the first information report as per Ex.P16 for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 307 of IPC and took up investigation;
(v) PW.15 deputed staff to secure the accused. On 11.03.2008 at 8.45 p.m. they produced the accused before him and he arrested him;
(vi) On 12.03.2008, PW.15 visited the scene of offence and conducted the spot mahazar as per Ex.P2 in the presence of the witnesses. During the said mahazar, he seized MOs.1 to 3, recorded the statements of the witnesses, sent the seized articles to the forensic examination;
(vii) On the basis of the statement of PW.1, he came to know that Gulnaz Khanam died on 14.03.2008. Thereafter he registered another first information report as per Ex.P17;
(viii) On the requisition of PW.15, the Taluka Executive Magistrate conducted inquest mahazar. Then PW.15 handed over the further investigation to PW.12; &
(ix) PW.12 collected the inquest mahazar Ex.P11, assessment register extract of the scene of offence as per Ex.P12, sketch of the scene of offence as per Ex.P13, forensic report as per Ex.P14 and filed the charge sheet.
6. The trial Court on hearing the parties framed the charges for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 302 of IPC and tried the accused for the said offences. On trial, the trial Court by the impugned judgment and order convicted the accused for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 304 Part I of IPC and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment of seven years and fine of Rs.15,000/-for the offence punishable under Section 304 Part I of IPC and rigorous imprisonment of one year and fine of Rs.5,000/-for the offence punishable under Section 498A of IPC with default sentence clause.
7. The trial Court based the order of conviction and sentence on the following grounds:
(ii) The evidence of PW.1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.