M.I.ARUN
GHODAWAT PACKERS LLP – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH THE SECRETARY – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioners are assessees involved in manufacture and business of Tobacco. Aggrieved by the imposition of Excise Duty and National Calamity Contingent Duty (NCCD) on the tobacco products being manufactured and sold, the instant writ petitions are filed.
2. Prior to passing of the Central Good and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘CGST Act, 2017’ for brevity), tobacco products were being taxed under the provisions of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. With coming in to effect of CGST Act, 2017, by virtue of Section 174 of the said Act, the Central Excise Act, 1944, except in respect of goods included in entry 84 of the Union List of Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India, has been repealed. Further, the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 also has been repealed.
3. Entry 84 of the Seventy Schedule of the Constitution of India deals with, apart from other things, duties of excise on tobacco and tobacco products. Thus, apart from levy of taxes under the provisions of CGST Act, 2017, excise duty can be levied on
Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community vs. State of Maharashtra
Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod vs. State of Maharashtra
State of Maharashtra and Others vs. Mana Adim Jamat Mandal
State of Uttar Pradesh and Others vs. Ajay Kumar Sharma and Others
Subhash Chandra and Others vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.