HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
Dinesh Shetty – Appellant
Versus
Station House Officer – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. On 2/5/2015, the respondent/police having received credible information and based on the said information, they seized wooden logs and Canter vehicle transporting the said wooden logs and registered a case against the petitioner and other accused for the offence punishable under Ss. 80, 33, 71(A) and 62 of the Karnataka Forest Act and also under Sec. 165 and 144 of the Karnataka Forest Rules and so also under Ss. 279 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
2. The police, after investigation submitted charge-sheet before the learned Magistrate against the petitioner. Being aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.
3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that Sec. 62(3) of the Karnataka Forest Act 1963 specifies that every officer seizing any property under this Sec. shall, as soon as may be, make a report of such seizure where an offence on account of which seizure has been made is in respect of timber belonging to the Government, to the concerned authorized officer under Sec. 71-A; and in other cases, to the magistrate having jurisdiction to try the offence on account of which the seizure has been made. It is further conten
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.