R. NATARAJ
Shivabai Baburao Kupati – Appellant
Versus
Mallikarjun Shivashankar Chikodi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. These appeals arise out of two suits filed in O.S.No.161/1995 and O.S.No.70/1996 for declaration that the sale deed dtd. 23/4/1994 and 26/3/1993 executed by the deceased plaintiff in favour of the defendant as null and void and not binding on her and also for consequential relief of injunction. Amongst the two suits, the Trial Court dismissed O.S.No.70/1996 and decreed O.S.No.161/1995 and declared that the sale deed dtd. 23/4/1994 executed by the deceased plaintiff in favour of the defendant as null and void. Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.70/1996, RFA No.1625/2005 is filed while being aggrieved by the judgment and decree in O.S.No.161/1995, RFA No.4135/2005 is filed.
2. When the appeal was listed for final hearing, at the instance of the court as well as at the instance of the learned counsel for the appellant and respondent, the appellants/legal representatives of the plaintiff have agreed to settle the dispute amicably by receiving a sum of Rs.25,00,000.00 towards full and final settlement of their claim in respect of the subject matter of aforesaid suits. The parties, thereafter, have filed a compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.