Back
V. SRISHANANDA
Umesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case establishment (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments of the accused (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. court's analysis of witness testimonies (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. court's reasoning on prosecution's burden (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 5. court's conclusion on burden of proof (Para 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 6. guidelines for admissibility of electronic evidence (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66) |
| 7. final order and acquittal of the appellant (Para 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72) |
JUDGMENT/ORDER
1. Convicted accused in Special C.C.No.186/2009 by judgment dtd. 11/7/2022 on the file of Special Judge, Belagavi has preferred this appeal.
2. Brief facts of the case are as under: Upon the complaint lodged by one Sharifsab Pakrusab Nadaf, Lokayukta police registered a case in Crime No.16/2008 for the offences punishable under Ss. 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Sec. 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Gist of the complaint averment reveals that, accused was working as a Junior Training Officer in the Government ITI College, Saundatti. Sister's son of the complainant by name Maktumsab was st
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
