SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 1468

V. SRISHANANDA
Umesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Santosh B.Malagoudar, Advocate, Shankar Hegde, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. Convicted accused in Special C.C.No.186/2009 by judgment dtd. 11/7/2022 on the file of Special Judge, Belagavi has preferred this appeal.

2. Brief facts of the case are as under: Upon the complaint lodged by one Sharifsab Pakrusab Nadaf, Lokayukta police registered a case in Crime No.16/2008 for the offences punishable under Ss. 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Sec. 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Gist of the complaint averment reveals that, accused was working as a Junior Training Officer in the Government ITI College, Saundatti. Sister's son of the complainant by name Maktumsab was studying in second year ITI in Government ITI College, Saundatti and final examination was scheduled to commence in 21/7/2008. Sri Maktumsab had paid necessary fee to be paid to the Government for attending the examination and accused received Rs.5, 500.00 from each of the student in the said class in order to see that the student would pass through the examination effortlessly. Accordingly, accused also demanded Rs.5, 000.00 from Maktumsab, which was not interested to be paid by the complainant however he paid only Rs.1, 000.00 and sought time for remitting the balance amount

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top