SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 833

ALOK ARADHE, VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
B. S. Ravi Shankar – Appellant
Versus
Leelavathi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mohammed Sheriff, Advocate, N. Byregowda, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. This appeal under Sec. 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, has been filed against the judgment and decree dtd. 6/10/2016 passed in M.C.No.3502/2012 by the IV Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bangalore, by which the petition filed by the appellant seeking dissolution of marriage, was dismissed.

2. Brief facts giving rise to filing of this appeal are that the marriage of the appellant and respondent was solemnized on 16/3/2011 as per Hindu rites and customs at Pooja Sri Convention Hall, Kamakshipalya, Bangalore.

3. It is pleaded that respondent suffers from superiority complex as she was a graduate, and the appellant was a matriculate. It is averred that the respondent used to condemn, ridicule and humiliate the appellant in various fashions. During the initial days it was within the four walls, subsequently the respondent started harassing in front of others and disrespected to appellant everyday. It is further pleaded that respondent used to involve his married sister, while harassing the appellant.

4. It is averred that respondent used to call the appellant as a womanizer, drunkard and she did not respect the appellant's parents. It is also pleaded that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top