IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M G Uma, J.
Swasthik M.B. @ Chitte – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka By Doddapete Police Station Shivamogga Represented By State Public Prosecutor – Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 939 of 2023
Decided On : 15-02-2023
Bail - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - The petitioner, accused No.1, sought bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in a case registered for offences under the NDPS Act. The court considered the nature of the offence, the quantity of contraband seized, and the petitioner's custody duration. It concluded that the petitioner was entitled to bail to avoid infringement of his right to life and liberty, subject to specified conditions.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, accused No.1, sought bail in a case registered for offences under the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and accused No.2 were found selling ganja to the public, and 1 kg 300 grams of ganja was seized from them.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the contraband seized was of intermediary quantity, and the petitioner had been in judicial custody since a specific date. It concluded that the petitioner was entitled to bail to avoid infringement of his right to life and liberty, subject to specified conditions.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner was entitled to bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in a case registered for offences under the NDPS Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the nature of the offence, the quantity of contraband seized, and the petitioner's custody duration. It concluded that the petitioner was entitled to bail to avoid infringement of his right to life and liberty, subject to specified conditions.
Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the petitioner was ordered to be enlarged on bail in the case, subject to specified conditions.
JUDGMENT/ORDER
M G Uma, J. - The petitioner-accused No.1 is before this Court seeking grant of bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in Crime No.477/2022 of Doddapete Police Station, pending on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge at Shivamogga, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(B), 25 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. (for short 'NDPS Act'), on the basis of the first information lodged by the informant- H.C.Vasanth-PSI.
2. Heard Smt. M.C.Shuba, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri. K.Rahul Rai, learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent -State. Perused the materials on record.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is arrayed as accused No.1. He is innocent and has not committed any offences as alleged. He has been falsely implicated in the matter without any basis. He was apprehended on 09.12.2022 and since then he is in judicial custody.
4. Learned counsel further submitted that it is the contention of the prosecution that on the credible information the petitioner and accused No.2 were apprehended. 1 kg 300 grams of ganja was said to have been recovered. The investigation is already completed. Detention of the petitioner in custody would amount to pre-trial punishment. He is the permanent resident of the address mentioned in the cause title to the petition and is ready and willing to abide by any of the conditions that would be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to allow the petition.
5. Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader opposing the petition submitted that serious allegations are made against the petitioner for having committed the offences. On credible information the petitioner and accused No.2 were searched and they were in possession of 1 kg 300 grams of ganja and cash of Rs.200/- was seized under the Seizure mahazar in the presence of panchas. The investigation is still under progress. Considering the nature and seriousness of the offence, the petitioner is not entitled for grant of bail. Hence, he prays for dismissal of the petition.
6. In view of the rival contentions urged by the learned counsel for both the parties, the point that would arise for my consideration is:
'Whether the petitioner is entitled for grant of bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.?'
My answer to the above point is in 'Affirmative' for the following:
REASONS
7. The PSI of Doddapete police station lodged the first information stating that on credible information, he along with his staff members went to the spot and found accused Nos.1 and 2 selling ganja to the general public. In the presence of the panchas both the accused were searched and contraband weighing 1 kg 300 grams was seized under the Seizure mahazar. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offences, cannot be accepted, at this stage. However, the contraband seized is of intermediary quantity and the petitioner is in judicial custody since 09.12.2022. It is not the contention of the prosecution that the petitioner is required to be detained in custody for any purpose, except to ensure his presence before the trial Court. Therefore, detention of the petitioner in custody would amount to infringement of his right to life and liberty. Hence, I am of the opinion that the petitioner is entitled to be enlarged on bail subject to conditions, which will take care of the apprehension expressed by the learned High Court Government Pleader that the petitioner may abscond or may tamper or threaten the prosecution witnesses.
8. Accordingly, I answer the above point in the affirmative and proceed to pass the following:
ORDER
The petition is allowed.
The petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail in Crime No.477/2022 of Doddapete Police Station, pending on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge at Shivamogga, on obtaining the bond in a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only) w
The quantity of seized drugs being a commercial quantity is a crucial factor in determining the grant of bail under the NDPS Act.
The quantity of seized drugs and the absence of criminal antecedents are crucial factors in determining bail applications under the NDPS Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the definition of ganja under the NDPS Act and its application in determining the need for custodial interrogation and granti....
The non-applicability of the bar under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act due to the quantity of contraband and the imposition of specific conditions for bail to ensure ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that bail is a rule and rejection is an exception, and it should be granted after considering the nature and seriousness of the offence, the charac....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.