M. I. ARUN, UMESH M ADIGA
Santosh M. Bhandari – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Ward-2 (1), Hubballi. Presently At: The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1), Central Revenue Building, Navanagar, Hubballi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Aggrieved by the order dated 25.03.2019 passed in No.CIT(A),HUBLI/10380/2015-16 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Hubballi vide Annexure-C to the writ petition and the order dated 20.12.2019 passed in ITA No.1812/Bang/2019, dated 20.12.2019 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC-C Bench, Bengaluru vide Annexure-A to the writ petition, the assessee has preferred this appeal.
2. The dispute pertains to non-acceptance of the statement of the assessee, that he has incurred an expenditure of a sum of Rs.3,47,717/- for the assessment year 2013-14.
3. The case of the assessee is that on the last day of the assessment year 2013-14 i.e., on 31.03.2013, he made the following payments in cash as follows :
| Sl. No. | Name of party | Date of payment | Inv. No. | Amount |
| 01 | Vimal Plastics | 31.03.2013 | 2702 | Rs.2,11,363/- |
| 02 | Radhey Shyam Hosiery | 31.03.2013 | 1479,2704 | Rs.90,454/- |
| 03 | A2A Clothing Co. Pvt. Ltd. | 31.03.2013 | 889,2707 | Rs.45,900/- |
|
| TOTAL | Rs.3,47,717/- | ||
4. It is his contention that he was constrained to make the said payments in cash as the same had to be made on
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.