PRASANNA B. VARALE, ASHOK S. KINAGI
N. Raghurama Reddy S/o Narayan Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka, Represented By Its Secretary, Department Of Rural Development, And Panchayath Raj, Bengaluru – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard Sri Jayakumar S.Patil, learned Senior Counsel and Ms.Deepika Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioners at length and Smt.Prathima Honnapura, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.
2. By way of the present petition, the petitioners who claim to be the residents/agriculturists of Hommadevanahalli, Myllasandra and Vittasandra villages, Bengaluru South Taluk, Bengaluru have challenged the notification dated 26.03.2018 issued by respondent No.3- Under Secretary to Government, Urban Development Department. A copy of the said notification is placed on record at (page 33) whereas, the translation is provided at (page 35) at Annexure-A. By the said notification, His Excellency, the Governor by exercising the powers conferred upon him by Sections 3 and 9 read with Section 349 of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 has notified the ‘Grama Panchayat’s Area’ of Doddathoguru including Bettadasanapura Residential area mentioned in Schedule-A along with boundaries mentioned in Schedule-B as the ‘Transitional Area’ of the Doddathoguru and further, specifying such area to the ‘Town Panchayat Area’ of Doddathoguru. In the petition, it is urged that the issue invol
Champa Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan and others reported in (2018) 16 SCC 356
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.