M. G. UMA
G. Moideen – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Revision petitioner, who is Accused No.8 in S.C.No.86/2020 on the file of the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, D.K. Mangaluru, is impugning the order dtd. 8/11/2022, whereby the application filed under Sec. 227 of Cr.P.C., praying to discharge him for the offences punishable under Ss. 170, 171, 419, 120B, 109, 399, 402, 420, 36 r/w Sec. 149 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'the IPC'), and under Ss. 3 and 25 of the Indian Arms Act, 1959 and under Sec. 7 of the State Emblem of India (Prohibition of Improper Use) Act 2005, is rejected.
2. The parties are referred to as per their ranking before the Trial Court.
3. Brief facts of the case are that on the basis of the suo motu FIR registered by Mangaluru East Police the investigation was undertaken and the charge sheet came to be filed for the above said offences. The contention of the prosecution as per the charge sheet is that a credible information was received by the police that accused No.1 was projecting himself as the Director of National Crime Investigation Bureau (for short 'the NCIB') and using the Car with the Board and Emblem of the State to make believe him as the Director of the National Inve
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.