H. P. SANDESH
Mohanachar – Appellant
Versus
K. Sreedhara – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dtd. 3/1/2007 passed in R.A. No.53/1998 on the file the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Sagar.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the counsel for the respondent is absent, hence, his arguments is taken as nil.
3. The parties are referred to as per their original rankings before the Trial Court to avoid confusion and for the convenience of the Court.
4. The factual matrix of the case of the plaintiff before the Trial Court is that the suit schedule property is Khaneshumari No.10 of Kubatur village in Aravatti hobli, Sorab taluk measuring east to west 56 feet and north to south 100 feet Mangalore tiled temporary house standing within the boundaries to the east by Khaneshumari No.9 (property belonging to Narayanachar), west by Khaneshumari No.11 (property belonging to Veerabasaiah), north by pathway and south by cart road. It is contended that the vacant site of suit schedule property was formerly belonged to one Keriyamma W/o Eligoru Sannappa of Kubatur village. One Nagappa S/o Keriyappa of Sarekoppa, Kubatur village had purchased the said property on 4/10/1983 through Kariyamma and the said s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.