SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 1010

SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR, G. BASAVARAJA
State – Appellant
Versus
Ambarish – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K.S.Abhijith, Advocate, P.Chandrashekar , Advocate

JUDGMENT

SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR J. -

This appeal is directed against the judgment dtd. 30/4/2016 rendered by the LIII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru in Spl.C.C.No.277/2015. Respondent no.1 was prosecuted for the offences punishable under Sec. 363, 366 and 376 IPC and Sec. 5(J) (ii) and Sec. 6 of POCSO Act in relation to offence said to have taken place on 27/9/2013.

2. The prosecution case is that the accused was in love with PW.4 for about two years since before 27/9/2013 and on that day at about 4.00 p.m., when PW.4 was returning from college, the accused enticed her to elope with him so that they could get married. They went to Vijayawada and from there to a village called Margianapalli where they got married in a temple and returned to Bengaluru. For about eight months they resided together in a rented house and during that time they had intercourse. Some time later the accused tried to marry another girl and this resulted in FIR being registered, investigation held and charge sheet filed against the accused.

3. Four witnesses adduced evidence before the court. PW.1 is the doctor and professor of FSL at Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Medical College, Bengaluru and his evidence

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top