SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 1153

H. P. SANDESH
Baby – Appellant
Versus
Leelavathi Shettigarthy – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Vyasa Rao K.S., Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants.

2. This appeal is filed against the concurrent finding and claim of the plaintiff before the Trial Court that the plaintiff and his predecessors were cultivators by profession, cultivating agricultural lands on tenancy right. The said agricultural lands were being cultivated by the various branch families of the ancestors of the plaintiff separately by dividing it in separate block of lands. After coming into force of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1974, the plaintiff and other branch families applied for grant of occupancy right in respect of the properties cultivated by them separately. The Land Tribunal Udupi after holding necessary enquiry has granted occupancy right to all the branch families of the plaintiff including the plaintiff separately in respect of the lands cultivated by them as per the order dtd. 15/9/1981. The plaintiffs' property bearing Sy.No.282/4 portion measuring 26 cents and the property of the defendant Nos.1 to 7 bearing Sy.No.282/4 portion measuring 30 cents are adjacent plots.

3. The aforesaid property of defendant Nos.1 to 7 is situated to the west of plaintiffs' property. The dispute is lingering

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top