Rajadhyaksha, J.

1. We delivered the above oral judgment Reported in A. I. R. (38) 1951 Bom. 45 : 63 Bom. L.R. 112 in open Ct. on Wednesday September 13, a writ in terms of the order made by us was issued on the same day. The Ct. was closed on 15th, 16th 17th. On Monday the 18th morning, before we received the transcript of the oral judgment, both Mr. Amin, who had appeared for the accused, and the Advocate General saw me in the Chambers. Mr. Amin stated that if we had not signed the judgment, he would like the matter to be mentioned again in Ct. so far as the liability of the Directors, viz., accused 2 5, was concerned. I mentioned to them my doubts as to whether it was open to us to review a judgment which was orally delivered by us in open Ct. Both Mr, Amin the Advocate General promised to look into the point. On Monday evening I received the transcript of the oral judgment. But in view of the fact that the matter had been mentioned to me earlier in the day, we postponed the question of settling the judgment putting our initials to the transcript. Mr. Amin saw me in the Chambers on Wednesday the 20th, I suggested to him that he the Advocate General should m