IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Chagla, C.J. and N.H. Bhagwati, J.
Appellants: Associated Banking Corporation of India Ltd.
Vs.
Respondent: Nazaralli Kassambhai
Original Side Appeal No. 36 of 1951
Decided On: 09.08.1951
BANKING COMPANIES ACT - SECTIONS 45A, 45B - JURISDICTION OF HIGH COURT - SUIT BY OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR - WHETHER RELATES TO OR ARISES OUT OF WINDING UP - INTERPRETATION.
Fact of the Case:
The Associated Banking Corporation of India Ltd. was in liquidation, and its Official Liquidator filed a suit to recover a sum of Rs. 20,000 and odd from a debtor. The question arose whether the City Civil Court had jurisdiction to try the suit or whether special jurisdiction had been conferred upon the High Court by reason of the suit having been filed by the Official Liquidator in the course of the winding up of the banking company.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court held that it had jurisdiction to try the suit under Sections 45A and 45B of the Banking Companies Act, 1949, as amended by the Banking Companies (Amendment) Act, 1950. The court found that the suit was a matter relating to or arising out of the winding up of a banking company and that the jurisdiction of the City Civil Court had been ousted.
Issues: 1. Whether the suit filed by the Official Liquidator to recover a claim due to a banking company from its debtor is a matter relating to or arising out of the winding up of a banking company? 2. Whether the jurisdiction of the City Civil Court has been ousted and whether special jurisdiction has been conferred upon the High Court by reason of the suit having been filed by the Official Liquidator in the course of the winding up of the banking company?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court interpreted the expression "relating to or arising out of the winding up" in Sections 45A and 45B of the Banking Companies Act broadly, holding that it includes matters that are connected with or have a bearing on the winding up of a banking company. 2. The court found that the suit filed by the Official Liquidator was related to the winding up of the banking company as it was an attempt to realize part of the assets of the company. 3. The court also considered the object of the legislation, which was to expedite the winding up of banking companies, and held that this supported the interpretation that the jurisdiction of the High Court was intended to be exclusive in such matters.
Final Decision: The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the order of dismissal passed by the lower court, and remanded the suit to the lower court for disposal according to law.
Chagla, C.J.
1. This appeal arises out of the decision of Mr. Justice Shah Holding that the suit of the Associated Banking Corporation of India Ltd., which is in liquidation, by its Official Liquidator, should be dismissed on the ground that this court had no jurisdiction to try this suit The suit was to recover a sum of Rs. 20,000 and odd, and it is not disputed that but for certain special legislation to which I shall presently refer the suit would have been trouble by the City Civil Court in Bombay as the subject-matter of the suit is below Rs. 25,000.
2. The question that we have to consider is whether the jurisdiction of the City Civil Court has been ousted and whether special jurisdiction has been conferred upon the High Court by reason of the suit having been filed by the Official Liquidator in the course of the winding up of the Associated Banking Corporation of India Ltd. An Act was passed by the Dominion Legislature, being the Banking Companies Act, 1949 (X of 1949), to amend the law relating the banking companies, and Part II of that Act deals with suspension of business and winding up of banking companies. When one turns to some of the provisions in that Part it is clear that the object of the Legislature was as far as possible to expedite the disposal of winding up of banking companies. For instance. Section 41 provides that the liquidator must make his report within two months to the court from the date of the order giving the information required by Section 177B of the Indian Companies Act, 1913. Section 42 provides that meetings of creditors may be dispensed with. Section 43 provides for a special mode of proof of amounts deposited by depositors with banks. The Act was amended by the Banking Companies (Amendment) Act, 1950 (XX of 1950), and Section 45A, which falls in Part IIIA, the heading of which is "Special provisions for speedy disposal of winding up proceedings : defined the "Court" in Part IIIA and in Part III of the earlier Act as the High Court exercising jurisdiction in the place where the registered office of the banking company which is being wound up is situated or, in the case of a banking company incorporated outside which is being wound up, where its principal place of business is situated, and Section 45A further provided that notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Indian Companies Act or in any notification, order or direction issued thereunder or in any other law for the time being in force, no other court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any matter relating to or arising out of the winding up of a banking company. Therefore, jurisdiction of all courts other than the High Court as defined in Section 45A was clearly ousted with regard to all matters which relate to or arise out of the winding up of a banking company. Section 45B conferred power upon the High Court to decide all claims made by or against any banking company including claims by or against any of its branches in India, and all questions of priorities and all other questions whatsoever, whether of law of fact, which may relate to or arise in the course of the winding up of the banking company, coming within the cognizance of the court.
3. Now, the narrow question that we have to consider is whether a suit filed by the Official Liquidator to recover a claim due to a banking company from its debtor is a matter relating to or arising out of the winding up of a banking company. It may be pointed out that the Legislature has used a slightly different expression in Section 45B. The expression used in Section 45B is "Which may relate to or arise in the course of the winding up." It is difficult to hold that the Legislature intended to convey something different by the use of the expression in Section 45A "arising out of the winding up" form the use of the expression in Section 45B "arise in the course of the winding up." Sections 45A and 45B are co-related. Section 45A ousts the jurisdiction of courts other th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.