SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Bom) 33

N.H.BHAGWATI, M.C.CHAGLA
Dhanraj Mills Ltd – Appellant
Versus
B. K. Kocher and Anr. – Respondent


Judgment

Chagla, C.J.

1. The petition from which this appeal arises is an entirely hopeless one Mr. Pritt with all his ingenuity has tried to make it as presentable as possible. The petitioners are the Dhanraj Mills they used in their mills imported foreign cotton of two varieties, Kampala Tan-ganyika. A control has been imposed by the Govt. of India on the sale of cotton mills can only receive cotton as permitted by the various Control Orders issued from time to time by the Govt. of India. The grievance made by the petitioner in his petition is that he was allocated by resp. I who is the Deputy Chief Controller, certain bales of cotton of the Kampala Tanganyika varieties for the yeara 1948-1949. This allocation was made on the hasis of the consumption of the mills of this cotton for a period of three years ending with December 1942. The petitioner applied for allocation of these two varieties of cotton to resp. l also for the years 1949-1950 , without going into figures, broadly the petitioners contention is that he has been allocated cotton of the Kampala Tanganyika varieties which is less than what he applied for to which he was entitled. His further contention is t







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top