SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Bom) 49

M.C.CHAGLA, S.R.TANDOLKAR
Commissioner of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
Century Spg. & Mfg. Co. Ltd – Respondent


Judgment

Chagla C.J.

1. This reference raises a question under the Business Profits Tax Act. The assessee company is the Century Spinning Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and its balance sheet for the year 1945 shows that it made a profit of Rs. 90,44,677. This profit was appropriated by a certain amount being paid for dividend and certain amounts being set aside for depreciation and other funds. Under this heading amounts were set aside for machinery, for buildings, for provision for taxation and for compulsory Excess Profits Tax deposit; and a sum of Rs. 6,08,637 was carried over as balance to the balance sheet. Now the question that falls to be determined is whether this sum of Rs. 5,08,637 can be called a reserve for the purposes of Rule 2 (1) in Schedule II of the Business Profits Tax Act,

That rule provides that

"Where the company is one to which Clause (a) of Rule 3 of Schedule I applies, its capital shall be the sum of the amounts of its paid up share capital and of its reserves in so far as they have not been allowed in computing the profits of the company for the purposes of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922."

Therefore, in order to determine the capital of the company, for the pu



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top