SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Bom) 41

P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR, D.V.VYAS
Mulshankar Maganlal Vyas and Anr. – Appellant
Versus
Government of Bombay – Respondent


Judgment

Vyas, J.

1. This is an appeal in which the judgment of the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Poona has been challenged. Appelllant 1 has been convicted under a. 168, Penal Code, and Section 6, Sub-section (2), Prevention of Corruption Act (II [2] of 1947) read with Section 5, Sub-section (1), Clause (d) of the said Act. Appellant 2 has been convicted of the abovementioned offences read with Section 109, Penal Code. On the first count appellant 1 has been sentenced to pay a fine of RS. 1,000 or in default to suffer 3 months simple imprisonment; and on the aecond count he has been sentenced to suffer 1 years simple imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000 or in default to suffer 1 years further simple imprisonment. Appellant 2 has been sentenced on the first count to pay a fine of Rs. 200 or in default to suffer 1 months simple imprisonment; and he has been sentenced on the second count to pay a fine of Rs. 300 or in default to suffer 3 monthss simple imprisonment. This is an appeal by the appellants against this order of convictions and sentences. The matter has come up to ua also in review on this Court issuing a notice suo motu to the appellants for the enhancem







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top