SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Bom) 170

R.S.BAVDEKAR, Y.V.DIXIT
Trustees of the Port of Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Yamunabai – Respondent


Judgment

Dixit, J.

(1) This appeal arises from an application for compensation made by the respondent under the Workmens Compensation Act, 1923, and the question which it seeks to raise is whether the respondents husband received personal injury by accident arising out of, and in the course of, his employment. The facts of the ease in which the question arises are simple.

(2) One Vinayak Yenku, a carpenter, was employed in a workshop situate at Alexandra Dock, Bombay, and belonging to the appellant. In the workshop he was given a table and a cupboard. There were other workmen besides Vinayak, and their tables were in line with one another. On May 13, 1950, which is the date of the accident. Vinayak went to the workshop and sat at the table assigned to him to do the work which was that of preparing a frame for a trolley. While there, a bomb exploded, as a result of which Vinayak received injuries. Ho was subsequently removed to the St. Georges Hospital, where he died on the night of the same day.

(3) The respondent, who is the widow of the deceased Vinayak, made the present application on June 22, 1950, claiming compensation in the sum of Rs. 3,500. The appellant filed a written stateme



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top