SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Bom) 154

M.C.CHAGLA, P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR
Mulchand Gulabchand – Appellant
Versus
Mukund Shivram Bhide and Anr – Respondent


JUDGMENT - (1) A dispute between the petitioner who is a member of the Bombay Provincial Co-operative Bank, Ltd., Dhulia, and the" Society was referred to arbitration under Section 54 of the Co-operative Societies Act. As the amount involved in the dispute was very large, viz. Rs. 53,495-0-6, the petitioner wanted to appear before the arbitral tribunal through his advocate and the tribunal rejected the application of the petitioner as it was governed by Rule 36 of the rules framed under the Act. That rule is framed under Section 71, and Sub-section (1) of that section provides that the Provincial Government may, for the whole or any part of the presidency and for any society or class of societies, make rules to carry out the purposes of the Act, and Sub-section (2) provides: "In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power such rules may.....," and when we turn to Sub-section (u),

"prescribe the mode of appointing an arbitrator or arbitrators and the procedure to be followed in proceedings before the Registrar or such arbitrator, or arbitrators and for fixing and levying the expenses of determining the dispute."

Now, under this sub-clause Rule 36 has been

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top