SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Bom) 103

M.C.CHAGLA
Bai Dahi and Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Shankarbhai Deojibhai and Anr. – Respondent


JUDGMENT - Chagla, C.J.

1. The petitioners before me are minors and they filed the suit, being suit No. 216 of 1945-46, by their next friend, the mother in the Court of the Second Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Baroda. The suit was dismissed for default and an application was made to set aside the order of dismissal. The trial court dismissed the application, In appeal the learned Assistant Judge has confirmed the order of the trial Court. The minors have now come in revision.

2. Now, it has been found as a fact that the mother was grossly negligent in the conduct of the suit. The suit was really attended to by the father and both the father and the mother tried to throw the blame upon a senior practitioner of the Baroda High Court, Mr. Shroff, saying that he did not attend to the matter. But Mr. Shroff has given evidence and has been believed that he informed Dalsukh, the father, from time to time of the various dates to which the suit had been adjourned, but Dalsukh never cared to appear in Court. The learned trial Judge actually adjourned the suit eight times before he ultimately dismissed it for default, and really on merits the case is as bad as any case can be. But what





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top