M.C.CHAGLA, S.R.TANDOLKAR
Ranchhoddas Karsondas – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City – Respondent
1. The answer which we have to give to the questions submitted to us on this reference is both simple and obvious. A public notice was issued Under Section 22(1) and the period fixed under that section was 65 days. The notice was issued in respect of the assessment year 1945-46 and that was on 1-5-1945. The assesses made a return on 5-1-1950, and in the return he showed his assessable income as Rs. 1,935. He added a foot-note to his return to the following effect: "My wife has sold her old ornaments and deposited the sum of Rs. 59,026 in the firm of Assar Syndicate in which I am a partner." On 27-2-1950, the Income-tax Officer issued a notice upon the assessee Under Section 34 and he made an assessment order on 26-2-1951, holding that the sum of Rs. 59,026 constituted the income of the assessee and assessing him to tax on that income. Now, it is this assessment order that was challenged before the Tribunal by the assessee and the Tribunal upheld that order.
2. Now, the order is challenged, firstly, on the ground that the proceedings which were initiated under Section 34 were not valid proceedings, and inasmuch as the proceedings were not valid, the order was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.