JUDGMENT - Chagla, C.J.

1. This is an appeal from an order of Mr. Bakhle Judge of the City Civil Court, dismissing the notice of motion taken out by the defendants for stay of proceedings under Section 34, Arbitration Act. The plaintiff filed a summary suit on 17-4-1952, appearance was filed by the defendants on 25-4-1952. On 4-7-1952, the plaintiff took out a summons for judgment, and on 12-7-1952, the defendants filed an affidavit in reply setting out the defence and asking for leave to defend. The defendants took out a notice of motion for stay on 24-7-1952, and this is the notice of motion which was dismissed by Mr. Bakhle. The ground on which the learned Judge dismissed the notice of motion was that by filing the affidavit in reply the defendants had taken a step in the proceedings within the meaning of Section 34.

2. Now, it is clear that under Section 34 it is necessary that the party who applies for stay should himself take a step in the proceedings before he becomes disentitled to the stay which is asked for. It must be some application made by the party in the proceedings, and as the authorities show that application must be of such a nature as to lead the Court to the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document