SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Bom) 25

H.K.CHAINANI, D.V.VYAS
Manilal Narsinhadas and Ors – Appellant
Versus
Bai Sushila – Respondent


Judgment

1. This Is an appeal by the original defendants. The plaintiff has filed cross-objections. The plaintiffs husband Mafatlal was the son of defendant 1 and brother of defendant 2. Defendant 3 is the son of defendant 2, The plaintiff was married to Mafatlal on 3-1-1951. Unfortunately for her, Mafatlal died in the following year on 17-8-1942. At that time Mafatlal was 24 years old. On 1,-10-1942, the plaintiff left defendant 1s house and went to reside with her mother.

In January 1952, she gave a notice to the de-fendants claiming maintenance. Her claim was repudiated by the defendants. On 15-4-1952, the plaintiff filed the present suit. She alleged in the plaint that, at the time when her husband expired, he was joint along with the defendants l and 2, that the family had a joint family business of building contractors and that the defendants had acquired extensive properties from the income of this business.

She claimed Rs. 70/- per month for her maintenance and Rs. 25/- per month for her residence. She also claimed Rs. 10,830/- on account of arrears of maintenance. Subsequently by an amendment of the plaint, the plaintiff asked for partition and separate possession of her shar






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top